In the first chapter of Superfreakonomics, Levitt and Dubner
provide a cost-benefit analysis of the choice to be a street-level or a high
class prostitute in Chicago. What really interested me about this chapter is
the last few pages – about Levitt and Dubner’s description of Allie, a
‘high-class’ prostitute in Chicago who spent her nights being wined, dined, and
pampered by wealthy businessmen. Allie makes an important observation about
herself in her interview with Levitt and Dubner - she could be the younger, more sexually adventurous “ideal
wife: beautiful, attentive, smart, laughing at your jokes and satisfying your
lust”(53). This, coupled with
Levitt and Dubner’s point that prostitutes have a harder time finding a husband
than a non-prostitute, made me wonder whether or not is was economically better
for a woman to be a prostitute or a wife, as well as why men choose to get married
rather than continually engaging with prostitutes (or doing both). In order to
discuss this question, we first have to assume that selecting a mate itself is
a market, and that marriages only occur if it is profitable for both parties
involved.
Because marriage can be an important (and sometimes only)
source of income for women, prostitutes themselves face an opportunity cost
when deciding to pursue this career. Prostitutes are paid so much higher than
women who work in other fields, or women who are wives, because they need to be
compensated them for the marriage-market earnings they gave up when they
decided to be a prostitute.
Because prostitutes are undesirable as wives, buyers must
pay a sort of ‘no-husband’ tax that a man normally pays if he is married.
Moreover, the opportunity cost for becoming a wife in comparison to a prostitute
is all the lower because wives can easily divorce and become a prostitute if
married life is not suiting them.
However, while they are more limited in the above respect, prostitutes
only provide (and are paid for) one specific service by men. Wives, on the
other had, deliver a variety of services – they cook, clean, and provide sex. A
study conducted by Lena Edlund and Evelyn Korn compares the two different
careers and determines the cost-benefit analysis of each. Assuming that both
wives and prostitutes are sellers of the same product (and thus are
interchangeable), this study determines that wives can offer more than a
prostitute at a lower cost. While prostitutes can only offer non-reproductive
sex, wives can offer their husbands both non-productive and reproductive sex
(ie children), and they offer it at a lower cost (ie, husbands do not have to
pay for sex, and, more often than not, wives provide other services like
cooking and cleaning, that prostitutes do not). However, although wives are a
low-cost alternative to prostitutes (ie you get more bang for your buck – yes,
pun intended), there is an opportunity cost to becoming/engaging with a wife –
it is a much longer contract than if becoming/engaging with a prostitute. Men and
women who engage in marriage have much different and greater responsibilities
to each other than a man and a prostitute would. Also, because marriage is a
longer contract, we must also take into account that wives age, and because men
cannot buy services from multiple wives like they can prostitutes, aging does
impose an additional externality on the buyer. This makes wives not have the
same guarantee for your money as with a prostitute. This lack of guarantee could be the reason for why married
men decide to engage with prostitutes as well as their wives. Moreover, some economists
consider wives to be superior to prostitutes because the consumption of the
wife increases as income rises – like fine wine. This basically means that the
wealthier you are, the more likely you are to consume champagne (wife) than
beer (prostitute). Essentially, from a male perspective, the greater your
income, the more benefit you will receive from choosing to marry a woman
instead of engaging with a prostitute every evening.
There are other ways for women to get income besides simply
being a prostitute or a wife. However, as Levitt and Dubner show through this
first chapter, the prostitutes of Chicago (whether high-class or street-level),
often make more money than they would working in a job in another field. Moreover,
based on the anecdotal evidence provided through Allie’s story of being a
high-class prostitute, women who are prostitutes have much more flexible
schedules, and work about half as many hours as women making a comparable wage,
making it seem like being a prostitute is a more economically desirable career
than working in a different field.
No comments:
Post a Comment